
 The year is 2019. The Watchers maintain a state of constant surveillance: guns are outlawed, media is censored, and unmanned drones patrol the skies.
 The year is 2019. The Watchers maintain a state of constant surveillance: guns are outlawed, media is censored, and unmanned drones patrol the skies.Buy on Amazon | B&N
 K. M. Douglas grew up in Northeast Ohio and studied creative writing at The Ohio State University. He lives in Rainier, Washington with his wife, cat and two dogs.
In the Place Where There is No Darkness is his first novel.
K. M. Douglas grew up in Northeast Ohio and studied creative writing at The Ohio State University. He lives in Rainier, Washington with his wife, cat and two dogs.
In the Place Where There is No Darkness is his first novel.
Follow K.M. Douglas:
Goodreads | FaceBook | Twitter | Blog
Follow the Book TourGuest Post Time:
Conspiracy Theories and the Social Subconscious
by K. M. Douglas
 I recently spoke to an AP Government class at Mentor High School in Mentor, Ohio, the setting for my novel, In the Place Where There is No Darkness. 
We discussed a wide range of issues that are found throughout the novel,
 including war and the lasting effects of war on its veterans and their 
families, one of the main themes of the book.
 One
 of the questions that I asked the class towards the end of the 
discussion was what they thought of when they heard the words: 9/11. It 
was fascinating to listen to what they had to say. The most important 
thing that I took from their responses was not the social and political 
ideas that they were brought up with, but the fact that they did not 
have an emotional attachment to the events of 9/11. They were not
 old enough to remember that day, so they only knew what they were told 
in school and by their parents.
 Later
 in this same discussion, I asked the students what they thought of 
‘conspiracy theories.’ They laughed. Probably something they don’t hear 
in school too often. When I asked them to give some examples of 
conspiracy theories, immediately a number of students said: JFK. In that
 moment I realized something. The assassination of JFK was my first 
introduction to the concept of a conspiracy theory, a concept that has 
held my interest ever since. In that moment, though, in that classroom, 
was the first time that I realized how important time and emotion was in
 the evolution of a conspiracy theory.
 I
 was able to look at the assassination of JFK with an open mind, reading
 various ideas that were considered conspiracy theories without judging 
them. I did not feel threatened by these ideas, because I did not have 
any pre-conceptions. I see now that this was easy for me because I did 
not have an emotional connection to the killing of JFK, just as these 
students did not have an emotional connection to 9/11.
 When writing In the Place Where There is No Darkness, I
 decided that I wanted to tell the story of a struggling military family
 in a unique and challenging way. I thought it was important to take on 
some of the most taboo subjects in modern American culture: 
pharmaceutical use in children, veteran suicide, school shootings, 
government surveillance and mind control. I needed something else, 
though, to alienate my protagonist even more. I needed a conspiracy 
theory for him to explore. My first instinct was 9/11, because really, 
at this point in modern American history, 9/11 is the most significant 
event that the country as a whole has experienced. The idea was for this
 book to be full of challenging and controversial issues, to deepen the 
divide between the characters and the world around them. I wanted them 
to feel alone, and I wanted the reader to experience this loneliness 
with them.
 Throughout
 the editing process I questioned the decision to use 9/11 over and 
over, considering using a fictional event instead that could represent 
an event such as 9/11. I was afraid that I might not only alienate my 
protagonist, but my readers as well. I did not want readers to reject 
the book because they were offended by some of the ideas that appeared 
within the story, especially one, like 9/11, that has ingrained itself 
so deeply in the social subconscious. In the end, I decided to keep 9/11
 in the book.
 The
 initial feedback that I have received from readers has shown me that 
they are willing and able to navigate these challenging ideas and take 
the journey that the novel has offered them, without being judgmental 
about the issues raised by the characters in the story. I will say that I
 tried as best I could to remain neutral in all the issues that I 
brought up in the book, to have them be the issues of the characters,
 not the author. I feel that I accomplished this goal. By using 
contentious issues in the book, I feel that I was able to raise the 
level of intensity that the characters experienced when confronting not 
only other characters, but life in general.
 I
 think that if this book came out in 2003, the reaction would have been 
much different regarding the use of 9/11, but after a decade, the 
social-emotional trauma of 9/11 has had the opportunity to heal, though 
it is has not yet healed completely. This book is not an attempt to pick
 at the scab of the social-emotional trauma of 9/11, it is an attempt to
 play a part in another kind of healing―the healing of soldiers and their families who experienced the trauma of the wars that followed 9/11.
 Author’s Note: A portion of the profits from each sale of the book, In the Place Where There is No Darkness, 
will be donated to the Fisher House Foundation, a non-profit 
organization that donates homes for family members of injured veterans 
to stay in so that they can be with their wounded soldier at their time 
of greatest need. It is important to me to let our members of the 
military know that they are supported even after they come home, 
especially after they come home, because for some of them, that is when 
the real war begins.
♥~~♥~~♥~~♥~~♥~~♥~~♥
♥
Please feel free to leave your comments and opinions♥ 
♥I enjoy hearing feedback from my fellow bloggers & readers!♥
 

An interesting idea, that conspiracy theories are only accepted and considered on a non-judgmental basis when there is no emotional attachment to the event in question. I'd be interested to know how you think this translates into issues that are not events, issues that cannot hold emotional attachment, or inevitably do, such as a person's claim to alien abduction conspiracy theories on a global, humanistic basis?
ReplyDeleteI read this book. It was a great short read.
ReplyDelete